“They’re
a bunch of bloody savages. They’re barely even human.”
This
is a common film cliché. It is delivered ironically by colonial oppressors,
invariably Europeans or Americans. The source of the irony is, of course, that
the Europeans are the ones acting like savages against the natives. It’s a
common, well-understood trope.
But
let’s define, culturally, what it means to be ‘savage’ from this well-known
line. The ‘savages’ are looked down on due to their rejection of civilized
culture and norms. But more specifically, to be a ‘savage’ you must reject this
civilized culture aggressively. Passive rejection of civilization is not deemed
‘savage’: the Khoisan people are not ‘savages’, as they passively resist civilization’s influences. The Apache, on the
other hand, by actively fighting back, were deemed ‘savages’ and the ensuing
attempts by Americans to destroy their culture made this labeling ironic. But were
the Apache civilized? Or is there some distinction between ‘civilized’ and ‘cultured’?
Undoubtedly,
we must now define what we mean by ‘civilization’ and ‘civilized’. And this
takes me back to intro Anthropology classes. My working definition of ‘civilized’ is ‘a
distinct culture which…’ and now it gets hard.
You
don’t want to say something like ‘is literate’ because that seems snobbish.
There are plenty of long-lasting, successful cultures that have no system of
writing. Nor do you want to disclude nomads, so you can’t say anything about
that. But you’ve got to draw the line somewhere. The most common definition of ‘civilized’
runs as such: “any complex society characterized by urban development, social
stratification, symbolic communication forms, and a perceived separation from,
and domination over, the natural environment.”
This
brings up the old European concept of the “noble savage”. In the Enlightenment,
it was increasingly common to look upon non-civilized peoples as noble, even
though they hadn’t figured out how to make trains yet. The sentiment may be in the right place –
just because a culture or person isn’t an urban-dwelling, letter-writing type
doesn’t mean they aren’t worthy of the nobility and dignity of the human race.
But it is rather condescending. So we’ll adopt the standard definition of ‘civilized’
and needs must leave our nomads behind, while acknowledging that this is not a form
of commentary, or judgmental decision, but instead a practical one.
Considering
the historical Apache, it is clear that they wouldn’t exactly, be ‘civilized’,
as they were a nomadic people. So for our definition of ‘savages’ the aggressive
party needs to be cultured, and not necessarily ‘civilized’ to resist. And this
makes sense. If it was one civilized group against another, it would be unlikely
that the epithet ‘savages’ would be used in a genuine sense. But no one may
doubt that the Apache were cultured – for culture is merely inherited
understandings of a group, whether that is writing, art, laws, customs, or what
have you.
So is
ISIS civilized? Are they a distinct culture? We’ve established that in order to
be savages, they must reject civilized culture aggressively, while possessing cultural
traits, but not civilized ones.
I
think it is easy to argue that they are a distinct culture. They have a clear
set of rules/laws and ideas, and a particularly abhorrent religious
fundamentalism due to their promotion of violence. Are they civilized? Here I
would argue that, no, they are not civilized. As a nomadic peoples, and as a
peoples with no real urban development, they do not qualify – although,
clearly, they are trying to become so in a violent ex nihilo sort of way.
But
for now, as they attempt to erase history by destroying buildings and
archaeological sites, as they attempt to erase history, by burning books and killing
those who stand opposed to their doctrine, as they attempt to wipe out any
religion but Islam, and more specifically their own cruel variant, as they
commit acts of genocide, mass beheadings, torture, rape and slavery, targeting
members of the press, and using child soldiers how could we say this is
civilized?
For, in the past century, we have, as a species, begun to create
bonds anew wherein we find ourselves sharing a common heritage, a common set of
laws, a common adoption and value of human rights, and pride in human dignity. Our cultural lineage is the history of all peoples. To be civilized is more than the anthropological definition, as we collectively enter the 21st
century. It is to be inheritor of the vision of a striving for our
noblest ideals, for the inherent worthiness of all persons, and the freedom to
exercise our talents and genius for the betterment of all humanity.
ISIS
isn’t civilized. They’re a bunch of savages. And we can say so, and must say
so, without irony, without sarcasm, without cynicism, and with the sincerest judgment.
No comments:
Post a Comment