Sunday, September 23, 2018

Little Black Classics

Just received a gift of the Little Black Classics released by the UK Penguin publishers. It's a complete set of 80 volumes, consisting of fifty-ish pages each. They range from complete short works (essays, short stories) to excerpts and selections of longer pieces.

While I am familiar with most of the authors, the particular shorter works are often ones I've not read. Indeed, 62 I'd not read upon receipt of the collection. (For example, I've read many works by Matsuo Basho, but not these particular haiku; or, having read various works by Swift, from Gulliver's Travels to the Tale of the Tub, but not the Little Black Classics' choice of A Short View of the State of Ireland.) But when you instead look just at the authors I'd not ever read, it becomes a much shorter list, of only 28 (with two anonymous works):

Gerard Manley Hopkins
The Gunnlaugs Saga
Pu Songling
Baltasar Gracian
Guy de Maupassant
Suetonius
Apollonious
Petronious
Johann Peter Hebel
Henry Mayhew
Hafez
Thomas Nashe
Mary Kingsley
Elizabeth Gaskell
Nikolay Leskov
C.P. Cavafy
Samuel Pepys
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (I mean, I'm familiar with his operas and such, but not his non-musical writings)
Christina Rosetti
Ryunosuke Akutagawa
Giorgio Vasari
Shen Fu
Richard Hakluyt
Catullus
Katherine Mansfield
Sappho
Basavanna, Devara Daismayya, Mahadeviyakka, and Allama Prabhu
Dhammapada

So I'm excited to start in on the collection. I read the Hopkins already (and greatly enjoyed it) as well as a volume containing two short works by Ruskin, which were pretty good. At the moment reading the Gracian volume - a Spanish Jesuit's maxims and aphorisms from the 1600s.

All in all a fun new project to carry out. The Penguin Great Ideas was very beneficial, and I'm hoping this will be as well.

Monday, September 10, 2018

US History Textbook Chapters

“If you could write your own ‘US History’ textbook (for junior yr high schoolers), what would the title be? And what would the chapter titles be? Bonus points if you can limit yourself to 20 chapters.”

I was asked this by a fellow teacher on Facebook, and so I decided to think about it.

Some considerations: The U.S. population in 1820 was approximately 10 million people. By 1920 it was well over 100 million. As such my US History textbook is going to focus on the 20th century more, as the 1800s will, increasingly, be seen as a prelude to the American Century...

Without further ado, limited to 20 chapters as requested, here’s what I’ve got:


Chapter One – “Kanien'keha:ka”[i] Early Native American Societies: Eastern Groups

·         Migration to North America, Mound building societies, Prominent societies east of the Mississippi

Chapter Two – “T’áá Diné”[ii] Native American Societies: Western Groups

·         Ancient Pueblo, Prominent societies west of the Mississippi

Chapter Three – “Con Cien Hombres”[iii] Spanish and French Colonialism: 1492-1776

·         Columbus, Spanish Florida and the Mission system, French trappers and exploring the interior

Chapter Four – “New Albion”[iv] British Colonialism: 1585-1776

·         Drake, Roanoke, and Jamestown, Origins of slavery, Original Thirteen Colonies

Chapter Five – “We Hold These Truths to Be Self Evident”[v] The Seven Years War and American Revolution

·         Seven Years War, Founders and discontent, Revolution and Articles of Confederation

Chapter Six – “The Right of People to Make and Alter their Constitutions of Government”[vi] The Constitution and New Nation

·         Constitutional basics, Washington, Adams, and Jefferson Administrations, War of 1812

Chapter Seven – “A World of Country Here to Settle”[vii] Continued Native American Wars and War with Mexico

·         Expanding past Appalachia, Tecumseh, Jackson and the Trail of Tears, Mexican American War

Chapter Eight – “Build Therefore Your Own World”[viii] Northern and Southern Society 1840-1860

·         Plantation life and changing slavery attitudes, Transcendentalism, Early Northern industrialization

Chapter Nine – “A House Divided”[ix] Civil War

·         Lincoln, Lead up and secession, Course of the War, Lincoln’s assassination

Chapter Ten – “Many of My Race …Sleep in the Countless Graves of the South”[x] Reconstruction

·         Bringing Confederate states back, New black rights and representation, Transcontinental railroad, Initial Asian immigration, Collapse of Reconstruction efforts

Chapter Eleven – “Once I Moved About Like the Wind”[xi] Modern East and Wild West: 1880-1900

·         Continued Native American Wars and reservation system, Technological advancements, Gilded Age society

Chapter Twelve – “Trade Is Brisk and Money Plenty”[xii] Turn of the Century

·         Spanish American War, European immigration culture, 1800s Women’s movements

Chapter Thirteen – “A Bayonet Sticking in His Side”[xiii] Progressive Ideals and the Horror of War

·         Progressive Era and Roosevelt, The Labor movement, Successful Women’s Rights, America’s role in World War One

Chapter Fourteen – “Nothing but Blue Skies from Now On”[xiv] High Times and the Depression: 1920s and 1930s

·         Technology and culture, Harlem Renaissance and Klan resurgence, Why the Depression happened, Dust Bowl, Roosevelt’s New Deal

Chapter Fifteen – “The Eyes of the World Are Upon You”[xv] World War Two

·         Causes of WWII, Pearl Harbor to Hiroshima, Postwar treaties and founding of the United Nations

Chapter Sixteen – “There Is a Misty Plot Afoot”[xvi] Early Cold War: 1945 to 1960

·         Causes of Cold War, Korean War, 1950s suburbia and Red Scare

Chapter Seventeen – “Moral Means to Preserve Immoral Ends”[xvii] Civil Rights and Counterculture

·         Civil Rights from WWII to Voting Rights Act,  New technologies, 1950s and early 1960s countercultures

Chapter Eighteen – “In Which…the Fruits of Victory Would be Ashes in Our Mouth”[xviii] Vietnam and Proxy Wars

·         Why America got involved and backlash, Vietnam War from 1950s – 1970s, Significant proxy wars of the 1950s-70s

Chapter Nineteen – “If I was Writing the Bill of Rights Now…”[xix] Political Realignment: 1972-1992

·         Reactions to new Democratic Party: Nixon’s Southern Strategy and Watergate, Cultural attitudes changing – women's lib, gay rights, etc., Reagan Era, Bush and end of the Cold War

Chapter Twenty – “When the World Stands Together as One”[xx] Globalism? 1992-Present

·         Peace movements of the 90s and America as Superpower, Digital revolution, 9/11 and Bush Era, Obama v. Trump Doctrines



[i] Mohawk word for ‘Mohawk’ (People of flint)
[ii] Navajo word for ‘Navajo’
[iii] From the journals of Columbus: “With a hundred men I could rule them as I please.”
[iv] Sir Francis’ Drake term for California
[v] From Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence
[vi] From Washington’s Farewell Address: “The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and to alter their Constitutions of Government.”
[vii] From Davy Crockett: “I must say as to what I have seen of Texas, it is the garden spot of the world. The best land & best prospects for health I ever saw is here, and I do believe it is a fortune to any man to come here. There is a world of country to settle.”
[viii] From Emerson’s essay ‘Nature’
[ix] From the Lincoln Douglass debates: “A house divided against itself, cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved — I do not expect the house to fall — but I do expect it will cease to be divided.”
[x] Senator Hiram Revels: “Many of my race, the representatives of these men on the field of battle, sleep in the countless graves of the South.”
[xi] Geronimo
[xii] From Mark Twain: “A crowded police docket is the surest of all signs that trade is brisk and money plenty.”
[xiii] Lyric by Pete Seeger for the Almanac Singers’ ‘Strange Death of John Doe’:

I'll sing you a song and it's not very long
It's about a young man who never did wrong;
Suddenly he died one day
The reason why, no one would say
He was tall and long and his arms were strong
And this is the strange part of my song;
He was always well from foot to head
And then one day they found him dead
They found him dead so I've been told
His eyes were closed, his heart was cold;
Only one clue to why he died -
A bayonet sticking in his side

[xiv] Lyric by Irving Berlin ‘Blue Skies’: “Blue days, all of them gone. Nothing but blue skies from now on.”
[xv] From Eisenhower’s D-Day speech to the troops: “Soldiers, Sailors and Airmen of the Allied Expeditionary Force: You are about to embark upon the Great Crusade, toward which we have striven these many months. The eyes of the world are upon you. The hope and prayers of liberty-loving people everywhere march with you.”
[xvi] From Miller’s ‘The Crucible’: “There is a misty plot afoot so subtle we should be criminal to cling to old respects and ancient friendships.”
[xvii] From King’s ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail’: “But now I must affirm that it is just as wrong, or even more so, to use moral means to preserve immoral ends.”
[xviii] From Kennedy’s Cuban Missile Crisis speech: “We will not prematurely or unnecessarily risk the costs of a worldwide nuclear war in which even the fruits of victory would be ashes in our mouth — but neither shall we shrink from that risk any time it must be faced.”
[xix] From Warren Burger: “If I were writing the Bill of Rights now there wouldn’t be any such thing as the Second Amendment.”
[xx] From Obama’s Nobel Lecture: “Those regimes that break the rules must be held accountable. Sanctions must exact a real price. Intransigence must be met with increased pressure – and such pressure exists only when the world stands together as one.”

Tuesday, September 4, 2018

Voting Against My Interests

I was having a conversation with someone who isn't really into politics. They had a busy life (due to super long days at work - not brunch parties, partying, and beach getaways) so politics had remained peripheral. Being only partially informed, and aware of the fact, they didn't feel comfortable engaging in what they recognized were conversations that benefited from an up to speed understanding. But they wanted to know more. On Facebook I had recently written the following, which had caught their attention:


We teach middle schoolers not to be bystanders because bystanders make the situation worse: by not intervening they condone the action, and embolden the aggressors against the victims, or empower others not to act. From a website on the topic, aimed at young readers:

"The word bystander is one that you have probably heard before. It is used to describe people who see bullying happening, but do nothing to try and stop it. It is important to remember that these people are not usually unkind. In fact, everyone has been a bystander at some point.
Most of the time, the reason why people don't report bullying is simply because they do not know how to, or don't realize just how bad bullying is. They are also often scared of the bully, and fear they will end up as a target.
It is important to remember that you do not have to face the bully alone, as most people don't like bullying. Share this information with your friends, and stand together to put a stop to bullying once and for all."

People who say they are "not into politics" and accordingly fail to act in light of crisis - you realize you are bystanders, right? I mean, if we can get middle school students to understand that you can't stay quiet on the sidelines, why then, when it comes to political aggression, can't adults be held to the same standard as eleven year-olds? Tuning out politics is like not making eye contact with the victim being harassed on the train, or walking by the person slumped over on the sidewalk. Easy to do, and tempting, but it emboldens others to avoid confrontation as well.

If you've been a "political bystander" in the past: no judgement. As it says above - we all have been a type of bystander at one time or another. But please consider getting involved in the 2018 midterm election. This is actually *easier* than confronting the sketchy guy on the bus - you're just casting an anonymous ballot that can help alleviate pain for millions of people, including perhaps yourself.

The choice not to get involved, though, carries the moral burden of having turned a blind eye to that suffering: The babies separated from their mothers. The citizens deported despite being born on American soil. The citizens whose island was left without power, or adequate federal response, for a year. The environmental damage that effects every single one of us. The deterioration of our education system that will devastate a generation unless reversed quickly. The systematic disenfranchising of American POC. The tax plan that will make it harder over the next decade for middle class families to put food on the table, and increase paycheck-to-paycheck living. The erosion of a free press that endangers the lives of journalists, like the five workers at a Maryland newspaper who were shot dead just a few months ago. The protesters who are risking their lives, and dying, to stand up to *white supremacy and fascism* when on display in places like Charlottesville - something we all used to take for granted as being abhorrent to civilized values.

Choosing to sit this midterm election out, to be a bystander, is an *active* choice to condone the continuation of this culture, and the pain it has wrought - and further encourage this suffering with your silent mandate. Don't be a bystander. Have the moral fortitude of a sixth grader.



So that was the context. Someone was asking me, identifying as a sort of moderate who preferred avoiding labels, about politics, and wanted to know more.

My statement was simple: I support human dignity and expansion of rights, minimizing suffering, and am willing to vote against my interests to help others, and often do. This "voting against my interests" is to me just a basic facet of society. I don't have a preschooler, for example, but I'm happy to pay more in taxes so someone else's four year-old has a better start in life. That's just...moral. 

The conservatives instead seem to me to be short-sighted and selfish, voting for their immediate self-interest, like their bizarre free-market cultism, at the every turn. That was my characterization at the time of the conversation.

Afterwards, though, I was struck by something: How often have I criticized Republicans for voting against their self-interest? Many, many times. And I then realized it's more subtle than my initial portrayal, since GOP voters often support measures that are so obviously against their best interests. As such, here's the more nuanced version:

Liberals (these days, in the United States) vote against their self-interest in ways that help and support the neediest, and the most vulnerable. Conservatives (these days, in the United States) also vote against their self-interest, but to help the entrenched moneyed powers stay wealthy and empowered.

Both sides of the aisle can set aside their own narrow views, and, while there are a lot of them, we're not a nation comprised entirely of NIMBYs. The yawning divide between our charity, though, is not whether we use our vote to make life more difficult for ourselves, but instead whom we choose to benefit with it: the sick, the wretched, and the poor - or the lobbying elite? The liberals see their disinterested view as moral and/or more advanced: by helping others we all benefit as a society, plus it's just the right thing to do, helping the needy. 

However, this does not address the reasons why Conservatives so often self-inflict these wounds. I have no doubt misinformation and willful ignorance both play a part, but not, I don't think, the entire role. Actual ignorance is of course an issue, leading to voting patterns of bigotry and the like. The flip side, mentioned previously, is when Conservatives vote for a narrow, immediate self-interest, at the expense of harming their fellow citizens. This is also morally bankrupt for Liberals, since your happiness is not worth increasing others' suffering. Can we get Conservatives to get on board with these fundamental ethics? I don't know. I remain hopeful for them:

"But they seem to know where they are going, the ones who walk away from Omelas."