Saturday, February 15, 2025

2025 Oscar-Nominated Animated Shorts

After last year’s depression parade, it actually was a bit nervous going to this year’s screening. Fortunately, there was far less trauma, and far more humor. Indeed, there were no bad options, and I won’t mind if any of them wins.

Since the five contestants were all lengthy, it also meant no ‘highly commended’ features at the end. In order of appearance, then:

 

Magic Candies

 

This Japanese short had gorgeous world-building and backgrounds. The lonely boy who gets magic candies that help him gain confidence, is sweet. A relatively safe choice, there were some good moments – but the overall arc felt off.

 

In the Shadow of the Cypress

 

An Iranian film gets this year’s coveted ‘parental trauma’ award! Yes, the Oscars seem to always nominate at least one feature (sometimes more) regarding parental abuse, dementia, death, PTSD, or some other trauma and how it affects children. Here a father is violent and oppressive and his daughter wants to get away, but is stopped by having a burden she needs to take car of : a beached whale. Symbolism!

 

Yuck!

 

A funny and sweet French offering, tweens make fun of adults kissing, but then two of them want to kiss. Most family-friendly of the offerings, and not undeserving.

 

Wander to Wonder

 

A very dark sense of humor infuses this tale of three mysterious little people who have to survive when the producer of their TV show dies. With elements of ‘Don’t Hug Me, I’m Scared,’ but without the same level of horror, this may be my favorite choice, in terms of novelty and execution.

 

Beautiful Men

 

Three guy friends want hair transplants, but due to a mistake only one appointment is scheduled. The premise of middle-aged male loneliness doesn’t do much for me, and the story didn’t quite work. Oddly the production was from the same folks as the previous film, including much of the same cast.

 

Preferred Ranking:

Wander to Wonder

Magic Candies

Yuck!

In the Shadow of the Cypress

Beautiful Men

2025 Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Nominees

Not a bad crop this year – except, as usual, for women. There are only two lead nominees, both of which should be inducted:

Mariah Carey – an undeniable vocal talent, and

Cyndi Lauper – an 80s icon, who has won all the awards

Really? No 90s women? Alanis Morissette, Liz Phair, Fiona Apple, PJ Harvey, Sleater Kinney… Ridiculous. Anyway, then, like Foreigner and Peter Frampton being inducted last year, you have the Oldies rock staples, who’ve sold well, whose songs you know, and who are totally fine:

Bad Company – I guess they’re fine

Joe Cocker – Had some big hits

Billy Idol – punk!

Chubby Checker – Sure, why not! Other inductees from the early days of rock aren’t as deserving, so Checker is fine by me.

The 90s get some love, too:

Soundgarden – perennial nominees at this point, a fine grunge band

Oasis – having a moment, kinda like they did in the 90s

The Black Crowes – Never a huge band, not really sure why they’re on here…

There are a few offbeat acts thrown in, for good measure:

Phish – I like their ice cream

Mana – a top-selling Mexican rock band. So far Richie Valens and Santana are the only Spanish-language inductees. So this would be the first rock band inducted from a non-English-speaking country. Which opens an interesting can of worms. A few years back Fela Kuti was nominated a couple of times, but didn’t get in. If you’re in the Hall of Fame, and not American, you’re from Canada, the UK, Ireland, or Australia. So, if Mana makes it, then things may begin to change. Whether that’s good or bad is difficult to say, but I lean towards good.

Then we have the real stars, the pioneers and innovators:

The White Stripes – one of the best rock bands in the past 25 years

Joy Division / New Order – been arguing for them for ages

Finally rap gets a single shout-out:

Outkast – Totally, this is deserved

Top Picks:

Cyndi Lauper

Mariah Carey

The White Stripes

Joy Division / New Order

Outkast

Good Alternatives:

Chubby Checker

Billy Idol

Phish

Joe Cocker

Not Great, But Fine:

Bad Company

Soundgarden

Oasis

Mana

Best Not:

The Black Crowes

What Does It Mean to Be an American?

Nationalism is, mildly put, tricky. A sense of identity based on a shared, mythologized, past is ever more elusive in an era of tribalism and division. My history of America probably doesn’t look like yours.

So what is our shared past? What is the basic American story? Here, again, we run into trouble. History has – with good reason, clearly – become a battlefield in the culture wars. Schools are fighting over whether they can even mention slavery – much less discuss its lived experience or effects.

Is there any shared identity and past we can agree on? I think there is at least some. Here’s a very stripped-down version of the real story – the sketchy cartoon – that, unfortunately, far, far too many Americans have as their understanding. Tragically, due to poor education, most Americans get a lousy retelling of mostly 1800s U.S. culture – further eroding a sense of unity and national identity. Its relevancy is largely unclear, so why bother paying attention? But I think even the casually invested kid would pick up on something like this:

“The colonies were British, and settled by people seeking religious freedom. The colonists wanted their rights, and wrote the Declaration of Independence. The Revolutionary War was due to unfair taxes from the British, and was won by George Washington, later our first President. The Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. The North was free, and the South had slavery on plantations. Pioneers headed out to settle the western lands, and fought with Indians, including the Trail of Tears. We won the Mexican American War, gaining lots of land. People realized slavery was bad – which some people had said all along like Harriet Tubman – and so they fought the Civil War…”

Even here, the paths diverge. We had the “lost cause” narrative, and the “states’ rights” narrative for so long, that many probably don’t even understand why the war happened, or see the gentility of the Southern aristocracy as ‘noble’. But to return to the story:

“The Civil War was won by the North, thanks to Abraham Lincoln, who was tragically shot. Black people were freed, but then things got worse again during Reconstruction. Meanwhile, brilliant Americans like Thomas Edison were industrializing the country, and railroads were being built. Cowboys helped tame the west. The Gilded Age saw people get very wealthy and build enormous mansions, which Mark Twain wrote about. America went to war with Spain and gained land overseas. European immigrants poured into the U.S., and lived in tenements, near the Statue of Liberty. The production line was made by Henry Ford. World War One took place, and Americans went and fought with our allies in Europe…”

This is around where the story would stop, for many – likely most. From my experiences teaching and as a student in multiple states, it’s a rare classroom that makes it past WWI. But let’s say they do…

“America was doing well in the 1920s, and women got the right to vote, but then there was the stock market crash, prohibition, the Dust Bowl, and the Great Depression. Things turned around under FDR, with the New Deal. We won World War II, defeating Hitler, and ushering in a new era of prosperity, and the 1950s culture of the suburbs. Civil Rights were led by Martin Luther King Jr., and segregation was ended…”

Note that the start of segregation is largely glossed over.

“Then America fought the Cold War against the Russians, and the Vietnam War during the 60s. This was the same decade as the hippies.”

And by this point, really, hardly anyone gets past. I’ve never seen a curriculum make it past Vietnam and the 60s – ever. Even the AP US course has one section on “1980-present” and it’s only worth 5% of the total of the exam. It says the following is important:

“Conservativism became popular under Reagan, and the Cold War ended, which America won. Our southern border became the main source of illegal immigration. The technological advancement of computers and the internet made things more complex. The end.”

Note that Nixon and Watergate are absent… So, yeah. I think this is the basic story – at best – that most Americans have of their country. It is full of holes, at times nonsensical, and troubled. But hey: At least it’s definitely ‘semi-mythical’.

*          *          * 

That’s the dry stuff, the frame story. What people, culture, and arts do Americans know, and share?

I fear that there is a yawning generational divide on this. Historical knowledge and popular culture have, for a century at least, had generational divisions – but they are much, much starker now. I think the Millennials, Gen Xers, and Boomers have a relatively shared culture. I was too young for Johnny Carson and Walter Cronkite – but I know who they are. They were too old for South Park and Ren & Stimpy – but they know who they are. You don’t have to have watched Cheers to know the significance of “Norm!”, Friends to know “We were on a break!” or The Office to get “Parkour!”

The same applies for music – we all know Elvis Presley, Stevie Wonder, and Michael Jackson. Boomers know who Kurt Cobain was, and Millennials know Tina Turner. Film, likewise: It’s a Wonderful Life, The Godfather, The Matrix: all shared. Even literature, thanks to popular classics, means most people have read or are familiar with To Kill a Mockingbird, The Great Gatsby, Catcher in the Rye, and Of Mice and Men.

But the Boomer to Gen Z and Gen Alpha gap, is enormous. 20% of the U.S. is Boomers, and Gen X make up another 20%. (5% are older than Boomers – Silent Generation.) Add in Millennials – and you get another 20%, totaling 65% older than Gen Z. So roughly a third of Americans don’t fit into this shared mold: and that’s obviously going to grow.

Gen Z is from 1997-2012. The oldest members are pushing 30 – it’s a major bulk of the culture. Even Gen Alpha, 2013-present (the final roughly 15%) are now entering high school, when cultural impact on society really begins. But these digital natives have grown up in a balkanized online culture that has little overlap between groups, much less people who aren’t part of that world. Influencers, YouTubers, podcasters – everyone has their own little niche culture now.

I think, to be culturally shared, you need to have at least two, and ideally three things: Your name is known, with at least some sense of identity; you are recognized visually; and a significant portion of the population, say at least a fifth, knows you well. Albert Einstein, for example, is universally recognized, people have heard his name, and they know he’s a scientist or physicist. A good portion of the population knows his work fairly well. I have never seen an episode of Power Puff Girls, but I recognize them on sight, know their names and their nemesis, and roughly know that they fight… crime?

The good news: Some culture is still universal. However, it’s very corporate – the billionaire juggernauts and franchises. We all know Taylor Swift, Star Wars, and SpongeBob. If you never grew up reading Stan Lee comics, you sure as heck know who The Avengers are now. Beyond this sort of dominance, though, it’s too compartmentalized and divided. Music has become a free-for-all; YA literature is overwhelmingly vast. There are way too many TV shows to keep up with. Only a handful of prestige dramas cut through the noise – and most people aren’t watching those. Shogun, in 2024, won all sorts of awards (Emmys, Golden Globes) and was a critical darling. 9 million people watched it in the first weeks. Compare that to the original Shogun of 1980 – where well over 20 million people tuned in. Roots, in the 70s, had more than half of American households watch. I Love Lucy commanded even higher proportions in the 50s.

But those days seemingly are gone. Whether that’s good or bad can be debated. Freedom of choice, individuality – these are things we prize, and rightly so. Conformity is often bad. But some conformity is necessary for a shared sense of identity: we have to have some things in common. And so, nationalism, as a consequence, begins to break down even further.

*          *          * 

Most troubling is what people turn to for identity if they don’t have a shared story and culture: things like religion, gender, and race.

Together we build our culture, and our history. It is our choices and actions as a collective that make us who we are, in a national identity. We are: The people who defeated the Saxons. The people of the purple hills. The people who play the gamelan.

For much of our more tribal past, these identities were religious, based on kinship, or based on dynasty. The Hakim tribe. The Zionist nation. The Empire of the Sun. The power of democracy is that we have more say and control of who we are, as a people. We are not defined by our race, religion, color or creed. Or at least, we’re not supposed to be.

Without shared identity – a sense of what makes Americans, Americans – the roots of democracy have begun to wither. Around 40% of American youth thinks a different form of government would be better. Many are open about the desire for authoritarianism, in the U.S. and around the globe. Not surprisingly, the older generation, that may have been through this, is less inclined.

But if we are no longer The People Who Watch Cronkite, or The People Who Listen to Stevie Wonder, or The People who Put a Man on the Moon, then we can be divided, instead of united. And divided, we can be easily conquered.

That division will be from within, and we can see it in voting patterns. Men and women vote differently. People of different races vote differently. Religion, gender, sexuality – these things become wedges instead of celebrated. Racism, sexism, antisemitism – all of these terrible ideas will start to reemerge and, unless fiercely stamped out, spread and grow. A host of invasive species in the ecosystem of our national identity.

So, what do we do?

Do we try to limit the balkanization of culture with more uniformity – more conformity? Do we encourage greater cultural diffusion, and intermingling? Do we ensure a shared, accurate, historical narrative through teaching? Do we force people to spend time together through service or bussing in schools? Do we focus more on teaching values and the characteristics that reinforce pluralism, empathy, tolerance, and democracy? I would say yes – to all of the above, and more. But none of it will be easy.

The alternative, however, is far worse. An America where sex, gender, and sexuality have a hierarchy. A caste system based on race, or religion. A land where not all are created equal. A land where democracy is derided, and strongmen rule, imposing their will and their whims upon us. A land where our identity is not forged by us, the citizens, but by the ruling class – whether that be corporations, an aristocracy, or kings.