1.
Leo
Tolstoy – 1908 (Instead of Rudolph Eucken)
The
Russian master Tolstoy is one of the greatest novelists in the entire canon of
World Literature. War and Peace, Anna Karenina and my personal favorite, The Death of Ivan Ilych are taught and
studied worldwide as some of the finest novels ever written. By comparison, the
German philosopher Eucken has not only not stood the test of time, having
played no serious role in 20th century philosophy, but was not even
particularly important in his own era. His is a case, all too common with the
initial thrust of the prize, where ‘idealism’ was sought above all else in an
author’s works.
2.
Mark
Twain – 1904 (Instead of Frederic Mistral)
Twain
would’ve beaten Sinclair Lewis, a very good but not great author, to the punch by
26 years for title of first American Laureate had he been given the prize in
1904. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
is widely regarded as one of, if not the best American novel. Other great works
have become critical to the canon, from The
Prince and the Pauper to Tom Sawyer.
Instead that year it was awarded to two authors: Jose Echegary – an important Spanish
playwright, and Frederic Mistral – an essentially useless poet. Mistral wrote
in Occitan, a language that is practically unknown. His poetry is, by a
generous standard, saccharine in an unpleasantly pastoral way.
3.
Jorge
Borges – 1974 (Instead of Harry Martinson and Eyvind Johnson)
Argentine
author Jorge Borges’ short stories radically transformed the genre. Seen as a
classic collection in his own time, and achieving international fame by the
early 1960s, works such as “The Garden of Forking Paths,” “The Library of Babel,”
and “Pierre Menard: Author of the Quixote” should’ve secured his winning the
title of Laureate before he died in the 1980s. He is listed third, however,
since the 1974 Nobel Prize was one of the most scandalous. Martinson and Johnson
were, at the time, both members of the Nobel Committee, and shamelessly
nominated themselves for the award. Both Swedish, adding to the skewed number
from that country, neither is considered amongst the finest in their field,
even in their home country.
4.
James
Joyce – 1939 (Instead of Frans Sillanpaa)
The
most important modernist of the 20th century was not an idealist –
far from it – and likely did not receive the award on this count. Of course
novels such as Ulysses and A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man
are now considered among the finest in the English language. By 1939 Irish
author Joyce had published his final great work, Finnegan’s Wake, and died within a couple years. Frans Sillanpaa,
admittedly, is one of Finland’s great authors – but he simply can’t compare
against Joyce’s incandescent brilliance and innovation. Not to mention that, as
a Scandinavian, he adds to the overall problematic total of that part of the
world. Further, he lived until 1960, so he could theoretically have gotten it
later, unlike Joyce, since after 1939 the award was suspended during the War.
5.
Henrik
Ibsen – 1906 (Instead of Bjornstjerne
Bjornson)
In an
all-Norwegian battle, Ibsen should’ve gotten the award instead of Bjornson. The
two make up half of the country’s Great Four literary talents. Ibsen was a
critical playwright of the 20th century, with works like Hedda Gabbler and A Doll’s House paving the way for modernism in theater, tackling
Edwardian taboos, and bringing to light important changing roles for women. Bjornson
is considered one of Norway’s finest poets, but his poetry simply does not have
the global reach and impact of Ibsen’s plays. Ibsen has stood the test of time,
Bjornson, most certainly, has not.
6.
Lu
Xun – 1931 (Instead of Erik Axel Karlfeldt)
It is
not surprising that China’s only received two Laureates, one in 2000, and the
other in 2013. In communist China in the age of Mao, we must recall literature
was not allowed to flourish – especially during the terror of the Cultural
Revolution. Lu Xun, China’s foremost modernist, had already written the bulk of
his critical stories by the 1930s, and was part of a famous leftist movement.
Easily regarded as the most important Chinese author of the early 20th
century, his reputation rests on short stories like “A Madman’s Diary,” “Storm
in a Teacup,” and “The New Year Sacrifice”. Karlfeldt, once again, is a Swedish
poet of moderate or mediocre talent who – surprise – years earlier had been on
the Nobel Committee.
7.
RK
Narayan – 1962 (Instead of John Steinbeck)
Narayan
is considered one of the foremost Indian novelists of the century. To date the
massive country has had only one Laureate, Tagore in 1913. Unlike China, or
Indonesia, there’s no dictatorship to blame for not being awarded more
frequently for such a massive population. His trilogy of Swami and Friends, The
Bachelor of Arts, and The English
Teacher all helped bring India’s literature to international attention,
especially since written in English. American novelist John Steinbeck, himself,
stated that he did not deserve the prize. While The Grapes of Wrath and Of
Mice and Men have flourished, much of his oeuvre is second-rate. Indeed,
his being awarded the prize was due to a split in votes between some superior
choices: Jean Anouilh, Karen Blixen (who wrote Out of Africa), Robert Graves, and Lawrence Durrell. The whole mess
could’ve instead been avoided with the indubitably-deserving candidate, Narayan.
No comments:
Post a Comment