Saturday, January 12, 2019

Kennedy Center Honors 2018


So back in December I watched the Kennedy Center Honors for the first time, and they gave their award to a couple of favorites: Philip Glass and Wayne Shorter. Two awards were also given to Cher and Reba McEntire, artists whom I own no songs of. A special award was given to the "Hamilton" team.

That, of course, got me thinking about which musicians had been awarded the honor whom I didn’t own. Leaving out a few conductors who, while technically having written some music, are not essentially musicians, as well as actors or actresses who are better known for their non-musical performances, I went through and divided them into composers and performers. From there I have put the musicians I don’t own (or, frankly, know the works of) in the following categories:

Bold – heard their music but didn’t like enough to own
Italic – had never heard their music before (and often, hadn’t heard of them…)

Classical Composers

Virgil Thomson
Gian Carlo Menotti
Morton Gould
William Schuman

Classical Performers

Rudolf Serkin
Van Cliburn
Nathan Milstein
Andre Previn* Also a significant composer
Leon Fleisher
Alexander Schneider

Opera Singers

Beverly Sills
Placido Domingo
Grace Bumbry
Jessye Norman
Marilyn Horne
Martina Arroyo
Rise Stevens

Popular Musicians

Perry Como
Sammy Davis Jr.
Loretta Lynn
Harry Belafonte
Gloria Estefan
LL Cool J
Lionel Richie
Reba McEntire
Cher
Marion Williams


So there you have it. And of course, for completion's sake, here are the musical winners whose work I do own. Note that a new category has to be added of 'Popular Composers':

Classical Composers

Aaron Copland
Leonard Bernstein
John Williams
Philip Glass

Classical Performers

Arthur Rubinstein
Isaac Stern
Yehudi Menuhin
Mstislav Rostropovich
Itzhak Perlman
Yo-Yo Ma
Martha Argerich

Opera Singers

Leontyne Price
Luciano Pavarotti
Joan Sutherland

Popular Musicians

Marian Anderson
Ella Fitzgerald
Count Basie* Also a significant composer
Benny Goodman
Frank Sinatra
Lena Horne
Ray Charles *Also a significant composer
Dizzy Gillespie *Also a significant composer
Roy Acuff
Lionel Hampton
Aretha Franklin
Pete Seeger
BB King
Benny Carter
Johnny Cash
Bob Dylan *Also a significant composer
Willie Nelson
Stevie Wonder *Also a significant composer
Chuck Berry
Julie Andrews
Quincy Jones
Paul Simon *Also a significant composer
James Brown
Elton John *Also a significant composer
Tony Bennett
Tina Turner
Dolly Parton
Smokey Robinson
Brian Wilson *Also a significant composer
Diana Ross
George Jones
Barbara Streisand
The Who
Bruce Springsteen
Dave Brubeck *Also a significant composer
Merle Haggard
Paul McCartney *Also a significant composer
Neil Diamond
Sonny Rollins *Also a significant composer
Led Zeppelin
Buddy Guy
Herbie Hancock *Also a significant composer
Billy Joel
Carlos Santana
Al Green *Also a significant composer
Sting
Carole King *Also a significant composer
The Eagles
Mavis Staples
James Taylor *Also a significant composer
Wayne Shorter *Also a significant composer

Popular Composers

Richard Rodgers
Alan Jay Lerner & Frederick Loewe
Jule Styne
Betty Comden & Adolph Green
Stephen Sondheim
Fred Ebb & John Kander
Andrew Lloyd Webber
Jerry Herman
*Lin-Manuel Miranda* - Recipient of a special award for "Hamilton: An American Musical"

Friday, January 4, 2019

Literary Modernism

I've been thinking about Modernism, having recently read a few short stories by Katherine Mansfield while also embarking on Beckett's Trilogy, which made me wonder about the style.

Modernist works can be quite challenging to read, which often leaves "lay" readers in a state of head-scratching confusion, frustration, or anger. There are two causes of these challenges posed: 1) atypical narrative style and structure, and 2) a necessary background knowledge/context.

Authors of the Modernist form created new narrative styles (such as stream-of-consciousness) and played around with rules of punctuation, grammar, and capitalization (like the first line of Joyce's Portrait of the Artist: "Once upon a time and a very good time it was there was a moocow coming down along the road and this moocow that was coming down along the road met a nicens little boy named baby tuckoo...."). This can be off-putting. 

They also frequently made their works only available to the very well-educated. Often their works are nigh inscrutable without the aid of explanatory notes, or else a very broad/deep cultural knowledge or education. A favorite tactic is the use of multiple languages. For this, consider the famed ending of T.S. Eliot's poem 'The Waste Land':

London Bridge is falling down falling down falling down
Poi s’ascose nel foco che gli affina
Quando fiam uti chelidon
—O swallow swallow
Le Prince d’Aquitaine à la tour abolie
These fragments I have shored against my ruins
Why then Ile fit you. Hieronymo’s mad againe.
Datta. Dayadhvam. Damyata.
                  Shantih     shantih     shantih

Or think about the cultural background knowledge needed to understand the lyrics of "Bob Dylan's 115th Dream" which deals with the Mayflower, Moby Dick, Captain Kidd and Columbus, and the New Testament. As well as a bit of Dylanesque nonsense, when he says he's employed by the "Pope of Eruke" ('Eruke' is a seemingly meaningless designation, although some suggest it is Greek...)

Bearing all of this in mind I made the following, admittedly highly subjective, graph:

(The works, by quadrant: 

Easy and Enjoyable: Waiting for Godot by Beckett, Mrs. Dalloway by Woolf, Ossia Sepia by Montale, Poet in New York by Lorca, Heart of Darkness by Conrad, Journey to the End of the Night by Celine, and Six Characters in Search of an Author by Pirandello.

Easy and Dislike: To the Lighthouse by Woolf, Winesburg Ohio by Anderson, The Metamorphosis by Kafka, Ash Wednesday by Eliot, and The Confessions of Zeno by Svevo.

Difficult and Enjoyable: Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man by Joyce, Desolation Row by Dylan, the complete short stories of Borges, and Ulysses by Joyce.

Difficult and Dislike: The Wasteland by Eliot, Calligrammes by Apollinaire, The Sound and the Fury by Faulkner, The Georgics by Simon, and The Cantos by Pound.)

Note that my scale of 'Ease to Difficulty' considers both of the two reasons for Modernist works' challenging status: the onerous structures as well as the depth of needed background knowledge. In particular, works that require an understanding of multiple languages were ranked at the farthest end of the difficult spectrum (The Cantos of Ezra Pound getting the top prize, which includes Mandarin characters, etc.). But that is, of course, another reason this is subjective: If you have conversational German, French, Latin, or Mandarin, then those poems may not be as challenging.

It was a fun little exercise. I am predicting that The Trilogy I am currently reading by Beckett - 'Molloy', 'Malone Dies' and 'The Unnameable' - will fall in that upper right quadrant.

Wednesday, January 2, 2019

And So It Begins...


With Warren’s forming of an official exploratory committee, it begins. The next 22 months will be a protracted race for the 2020 Presidency. And there is a new, highly consequential difference between this election season and those previous.

*          *          *

Primaries. They can be voting-based, or caucuses, but regardless they determine the nominee. The party die-hards show up and nominate a candidate – non-affiliated independent voters have no say in this crucial first step. Only after the primaries does the Party have the official Convention to declare their candidate.

The first four primaries are supposed to serve as a snapshot of the country: one state each from the Midwest, the Northeast, the South, and the West. These states are Iowa (6 electoral votes), New Hampshire (4 electoral votes), South Carolina (9 electoral votes), and Nevada (6 electoral votes). These are medium-small states. And, excepting South Carolina, they can wobble between voting for Republicans and Democrats. Nevada is only very tentatively starting to be chalked up to the Democrats – same with New Hampshire. Iowa voted for both parties pretty consistently over the past two decades.

The Presidential candidates, which for 2020 will probably just be Democrats, will spend a lot of time in these four states, going to Iowa County Fairs, New Hampshire backyards, and schmoozing with the big Las Vegas donors of Nevada. South Carolina is important, though, for gauging certain aspects of your campaign – because the South votes for three type of Democratic candidates: 1) Conservative Democrats (an essentially extinct breed), 2) Candidates who come from the South, and 3) Candidates who resonate with black voters.

Now, it is not a coincidence that from 1964 to 2008 all the Democratic Presidents were southerners (LBJ, Carter, and Clinton). For example, Clinton in 92, being the governor of Arkansas, was able to pick up his home state as well as Louisiana, Georgia, and Tennessee. Carter – the governor of Georgia – swept the South in 76, riding high on disgust of the Nixon/Ford era.

But that was a different time. Consider that, in 1976, California voted Republican – as it would in every election between 1968 and 1992. The poles do realign, eventually. The country changes.

So, South Carolina doesn’t help much unless you’re either from the South or do well with black voters. It’s not a coincidence, after all, that it was Obama who broke the Southern Democratic President streak.

After those first four primary states, then, comes the initial Super Tuesday. A day which, for Democrats, is a real problem. Because the states that vote on Super Tuesday are mostly from the South. It’s a firewall, of sorts: unless you resonate with black voters, or more conservative Democrats, or are from a Southern state: you are going to have a very bad day. The states you need to win – after all – are almost certainly not going to vote for you in the general election. They are: Alabama, North Carolina, Oklahoma (which has the most conservative Presidential voting record in US history), Tennessee, and Texas. This Southern blockade is serious, and has been an issue in the general election. Even Al Gore, former TN Senator, didn’t win his state in 2000. And John Edwards, Kerry’s running mate in 2004, couldn’t deliver his home state of North Carolina.

Keeping this in mind, and looking at the likely strong candidates (ones who can actually raise money and have a shot), here’s who I am leaving out of the race as serious contenders, and why:

Joe Biden. Biden is too old (78 in 2020), and he will probably not do well as people dig into his past. Remember all those creepy backrubs? I don’t see him winning in any of the first four primary states.

Kirsten Gillibrand. If Warren wasn’t running, she’d have a shot. But Warren is more likely to win states like New Hampshire and Iowa. Gillibrand isn’t as well known.

Beto O’Rourke. He didn’t win. Against Ted Cruz. I mean, if you can’t win in your own state, that’s a dangerous gamble that you’ll do well with the rest of the country.

Eric Holder. Doesn’t place in even a distant third in the first three primaries. Maybe does well in South Carolina, but perhaps not against bigger names like Harris and Booker.

Bernie Sanders. Way too old (79 in 2020) and tarnished as an also-ran. The prevailing sense is that he had his moment – and now it’s over. Sanders and Biden do well in polling because they are well-known: They’ve hit the campaign trail before (Biden several times). But the Dems need a younger candidate, to increase their chance of success in the general election. Thor Hogan provides the data in his recent Washington Post piece.

So. Let’s now pivot to the actual strong candidates:

Elizabeth Warren
Cory Booker
Kamala Harris
Julian Castro

Only Castro is from the South (Texas) and Booker or Harris will do better in the other Super Tuesday Southern states (Alabama, North Carolina, Tennessee). I think Warren will probably do well in Oklahoma – since it is both her home state, and a “Southern” state that is only 6% black – unlike the others (Alabama – 25%, North Carolina – 22%, Tennessee – 16%, and Texas – 12%).

Let’s create a likely map, then, of early wins with these four candidates.

Iowa and New Hampshire likely go to Warren. South Carolina goes to either Booker or Harris. Nevada is messy – but possibly Castro. Warren, I don’t think, does well in the state, and Nevada is almost 30% Hispanic, which helps Castro, I should think.

Super Tuesday, March 3rd, then has Alabama, North Carolina, and Tennessee going to Booker or Harris – or some sort of divvying if both are still in it at that point. Texas goes to Castro (nearly 40% Hispanic). Warren picks up Oklahoma – and the two Democratic states I’ve not yet mentioned which vote on that day: Massachusetts (Warren’s state) and Vermont.

*          *          *

At the start of this column I suggested this year was different. And Super Tuesday is why – because this time around California will be the final, ninth, state to vote on that day.

Harris does well in CA just for name recognition as the state's Senator. It’s cheaper for her to campaign there as well. Booker and Warren are East Coasters, after all. California’s own governor, Gavin Newsom, has said he won’t be running, which clears out any CA hometown competition (he could, of course, change his mind). I think, however, that Castro could give Harris a run for her money in the state. And if Booker does well in SC and the Southern states, Harris may not make it to her home state race.

Imagine if Castro gets NV, CA, and TX, while Warren picks up the pieces, and Booker or Harris has a stronghold on the South? In the general election California and Texas have a combined 93 electoral votes – a third of all delegates could be in Castro’s pocket after Super Tuesday, if, say, Booker knocks out Harris.

Now, I don’t say this is likely, nor is this my prediction. I’m merely floating it as a potential outcome of the Democrat’s new primary calendar, with California as a Super Tuesday entrant. Harris is more likely to win CA than Castro. But Castro is the only other name, with Warren, who has actually taken the formal steps to run: He, too, has created an exploratory committee.

A Warren/Castro ticket would be formidable: it puts Florida seriously in play, as well as Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Ohio – Midwestern states where Warren does well. On the other hand, it runs afoul of the Trump die-hards – the deplorables – who would like nothing better than to see Trump take the stage against “Pocahontas” and a Hispanic VP, Castro, going up against Pence. The Trumpists, the Fox News crowd, would turn out in droves. Someone Trump hasn’t had the same animosity with, like Harris, whom he’s not even insulted on Twitter (!) may keep the frothers at bay, while energizing a party that wants a young candidate. In the end, Warren, at 71 when the election rolls around, is much older than Harris (56 in 2020), Booker (51 in 2020), or Castro (46 in 2020). She was wise to form her committee early, and she will be counting on the steam of Iowa and New Hampshire to dampen her losses on Super Tuesday. But if Booker or Harris chooses eventually not to run, then she could settle accounts with Castro early, and provide a pretty strong, unified, Democratic ticket.

But what do I know? I predicted Castro would be on the ticket with Clinton years before she announced she was running, and she instead picked Tim Kaine. At any rate...


Monday, December 31, 2018

2018 in Books


Keeping the tradition alive. This year I read what is likely a record lowest number of books perhaps since high school. After the richness of last year's reading, 2018 was a bit humdrum, and there are a fair number of 2-star works on here. Nonetheless, here's what I read:

Nonfiction

The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire by Edward Gibbon

For nearly six years I slowly made my way through this work. At one point Gibbon mentions “historians of blood” – which I am not. I have very little interest in battles, rulers, and such. The work continues through the entirety of the Byzantine era, and Gibbon does not consider the exercise complete until the Ottoman conquest of Constantinople in 1493. Thousands of names and hundreds of battles later, I remember almost no details, and consider it mostly a waste, except for Gibbon’s amusing asides and reflections.

Well Met: Renaissance Faires & The American Counterculture by Rachel Lee Rubin

Noticeably repetitive, Rubin still manages to make a strong point in her work tracing the role of the Faire’s origins in the 1960s to the utopian visions of that decade to the continuing role as a safe space for genderqueer patrons and others. The last chapter is perhaps the oddest, looking at the role of faire in literature, but all in all a worthwhile study.

Wonderful Life by Stephen Jay Gould

Thirty years have passed since Gould’s popular account of the Cambrian and the now-more-famous Burgess Shale. The basic thrust is that contingency is more important to evolution than popularly considered. This volume is the record-holder for longest on my shelf, having stayed there from either late middle or early high school. Having tackled his more complex academic work last year I found Wonderful Life to be more accessible, but a little bit overstuffed.

These Truths by Jill Lepore

A massive, 800-page history of the United States, from Columbus to Trump. The focus is fairly exclusively political, and, excepting some troubling omissions (in particular Native American citizenship when citizenship is one of her main themes), it is a very worthwhile, and arguably very important book to read.

The Fifth Risk by Michael Lewis

Quick, fascinating, and significant. Lewis charts how an administrative hollowing-out of the US government (focusing on the Departments of Energy, Agriculture, and Commerce) poses an unexpected risk to our country – even more, actually, than someone (who finds the idea of "hollowing out"  fairly scary) might already expect.

Fiction

Point Counter Point by Aldous Huxley

Just prior to Brave New World Huxley wrote this very funny, but also rather acidic, account of intellectual pretensions in England in the 1920s. The cast is based on real personalities (DH Lawrence, Oswald Mosley, Huxley himself) but that fact is in no way necessary to enjoy the work.

One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest by Ken Kesey

One of those works I had meant to read for some time. I had greatly disliked the movie, but this showed me that was more Jack Nicholson, and not the main character. Problematic and dated, of course, but in all I understand why its reputation holds, and could see myself recommending this to the right person.

Confessions of Zeno by Italo Svevo

Perhaps if I’d encountered Svevo’s work before Joyce, or Woolf, or other, better, Modernists, I’d have more appreciation for his style. As is the main character is what is now considered a stock unreliable narrator, a sort of pre-stream-of-consciousness version of Roth’s Portnoy.

Devil on the Cross by Ngugi Wa Thiong’o

In an ongoing attempt to broaden horizons I figured I’d read this classic by a Kenyan author who wrote the work while imprisoned. Not all that surprising, then, that the resulting work is a bit preachy and defiantly righteous – it reminded me of Lang’s Metropolis in tone – while having some interesting experimental structure.

Appointment in Samarra by John O’Hara

After slogging through psychological portraits that I found unpleasant, O’Hara’s cast was wonderfully human, tragic without a capital ‘T’, and relatable. His use of language and description was also vivid, a quality I was starting to miss.

A Coffin for Dimitrios by Eric Ambler

A fun spy novel – indeed, apparently the “birth of the modern spy novel” – which has a typical fast-paced plot and lots of fun twists and turns.

The Sound of the Mountain by Yasunari Kawabata

Interesting in blending the aging father’s psychology with the unpleasantness of dealing with his adult children’s struggling marriages. A good read.

As kingfishers catch fire by Gerard Manley Hopkins

My father bought me the complete Penguin Little Black Classics. These short (50-ish page) volumes are often extracts. Many, being short stories and extracts, I will not bother to include here. However, this volume was a selection of Hopkins’ best poetic work, which I thoroughly enjoyed, as one previously unfamiliar with his verse.

The nightingales are drunk by Hafez

Another Penguin LBC, this one containing the poetry of Hafez, a Sufi writer of the 1200s. Along with Sadi, Rumi, and Omar Khayyam, Hafez is considered a master, and I was glad to finally engage with his work.

Remember, body by CP Cavafy

Yet another Penguin LBC – and another poet whom I’d never bothered to get to, and whose work was powerful and excellent. For each of these LBCs mentioned, there are another three which are not; but this work was very enjoyable.

Independent People by Halldor Laxness

A peasant epic of the highest order, with a strong message of how finance can come to ruin good, hardworking people – a seemingly timeless moral, given its native Icelandic setting’s recent banking woes. Has the common issues of books of a certain age with regards to women and others, but as its written from the tonal point of view of the bigoted and stubborn sheep-crofter, perhaps that’s a narrative license.

Dear Life by Alice Munro

The Canadian Nobel laureate’s collection of recent short fiction left a mark – the stories are excellent, and clearly destined to be classics. Oddly, their power was blunted, perhaps, by the fact that so many modern short story authors are so indebted to her now-commonplace narrative and time-hopping style.

The Family of Pascual Duarte by Camilo Jose Cela

A short, violent existentialist work of life in rural Spain lived by an unreliable couple of sets of narrators. A definite page-turner and intriguing work with a lack of moral but lots of profound reflections.

The Red Badge of Courage by Stephen Crane

It’s genuinely odd to read a war novel, anymore, that is triumphal and holds a nineteenth century view of battle as glorious – which Crane’s work balances with a wide-eyed realism. Definitely the best work of fiction I’ve read concerning the Civil War.

The Loa of the Divine Narcissus By Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz

This short, and increasingly famous allegorical play is worth reading as a document of the attempts to intertwine the indigenous and Spanish cultures of Mexico. Like Montaigne’s famous essay “On Cannibals” there is a level of rare and worthwhile moral / spiritual relativism.

Lord Jim by Joseph Conrad

I gave up caring about Jim around 200 pages in, and found the conclusion to be of little help. Only if you are over the moon for Heart of Darkness would I recommend. It is not as good.

Rhinoceros and Other Plays by Eugene Ionesco

Rhinoceros is an excellent work, one of the best 20th century plays I’ve read. The other two works (The Leader and The Future is in Eggs)…are not. In fact, they’re fairly dreadful.

Graphic Novels

The Sandman: Endless Nights by Neil Gaiman et al.

I enjoyed Sandman a great deal, but never enough to further seek out its spin-offs. So when this volume was given as a gift I perused it, enjoyed it, and shelved it. If you like Sandman this is up your alley.

Sabrina by Nick Drnaso

The emotional void which meets the characters in light of the most vivid horror is why Drnaso’s work is so heralded, and even shortlisted (a graphic novel first) for the Booker. Is it… reasonable? expected? A success? if the book leaves you in a void as well? I don’t really know, but I was nevertheless left feeling that folks could probably get something out of reading this work.

Locke and Key by Joe Hill and Gabriel Rodriguez

What begins as compelling horror turns into a generational mystery, and a relatively straightforward one. Still, with good art and characters, and a solid, if increasingly tired out-of-sync narrative style, this was one of the better graphic novels I’ve read in a good long time.

Top 5 of 2018

The Fifth Risk by Michael Lewis
These Truths by Jill Lepore
The Family of Pascual Duarte by Camilo Jose Cela
Appointment in Samara by John O’Hara
Locke and Key by Joe Hill and Gabriel Rodriguez

Unlike last year, where I had too many 5-star books, I read no 5-star works this year, but these are all very good, 4-star works.

Sunday, December 16, 2018

Film Registry Animated Shorts

So here in the United States we have a National Film Registry. Every year they add more things, and they just announced their newest inductees. They have, over the years, not added that many animated short subjects, though. Here they are, with their Wikipedia links for more info:

A Computer Animated Hand 1972
Duck Amuck 1953
Duck and Cover 1951

I've seen nearly all of these, and in general like to think I know a little something about animation in the U.S. (The only one I've not seen: John Henry and the Inky-Poo. But I am familiar with George Pal's "puppetoons".)

That said, here are a dozen I think should be added:


1. The Cat Concerto, 1947

It's odd that there's no Hanna Barbera anywhere on the list, but a good place to start would be with their iconic Tom and Jerry cartoons, and The Cat Concerto is probably the best of these. It also won the Academy Award.


2. Minnie the Moocher, 1932

Currently there is only one Betty Boop cartoon on the list - the excellent 1933 version of Snow White. Minnie the Moocher is another pairing with Cab Calloway, and an excellent surrealist cartoon with themes of death and weirdness. Bimbo's Initiation would be another good choice.


3. Red Hot Riding Hood, 1943

I like Chuck Jones as much as the next person, but he has Duck Amuck, One Froggy Evening, and What's Opera, Doc? all on there. Poor Tex Avery only has one, and not as well-known: Magical Maestro. He should get another, better-known, work, and Red Hot is an undisputed classic.


4. Der Fuehrer's Face, 1943

Another odd omission - no WWII wartime cartoons. This Disney piece, featuring Donald Duck as a Nazi, describes how bad life would be under fascism. It shows off surrealist aspects similar to Dumbo's Pink Elephants sequence. Another Academy Award winner.


5. Superman, 1941

For many this was the visual introduction of the character, and it helped establish certain norms of the superhero (for example, changing in a phone booth). It is the first of a series of shorts, all of which could be added, it they like. Also just a beautiful, stylized animated cartoon.


6. Felix in Hollywood, 1923

Like Tom and Jerry, Felix the Cat is an icon, and should be included in the Registry. This work began a trope in animated films of caricaturing Hollywood actors that became especially popular for Looney Tunes, but also Disney.


7. Coal Black and de Sebben Dwarfs, 1943

Censorship and an ugly past combine in this work: a racist depiction of African-American soldiers made during the War, which was attempting to create a positive message... I think the Registry should preserve our entire culture, not just the moments we find inspiring, but also include our more troubled past, of which this is a part.


8. Closed Mondays, 1974

The late, great Will Vinton won an Academy Award for this ground-breaking Claymation piece done with Bob Gardiner. In the years that would follow stop-motion clay animated shorts would become increasingly mainstream due to the early success of this and other Vinton works.


9. Peace on Earth, 1939

An MGM production that, on the eve of WWII, told a moralistic, but somewhat disturbing, tale of the folly of Man - referencing to the horrors of the First World War. Also showcases Harman, of Harman and Ising, as a director of animated shorts.


10. Hell-Bent for Election,  1944

UPA has a good representation on the list above, with both Gerald McBoing-Boing and The Telltale Heart. This little-known short, though, was the great granddaddy to UPA - and began the stylistic pattern for their unique visuals. The short is a propaganda cartoon for UAW works to vote for Roosevelt in '44. In general more UPA: A Unicorn in the Garden would be good, too.


11. Bambi Meets Godzilla, 1969


12. Rejected, 2000

The criteria for inclusion in the Registry is only 10 years, so Don Hertzfeldt's now-iconic, disturbing, animated work of meta-themes, anti-humor and anti-consumerism is more than eligible for being added to a list of the best films ever made. My personal favorite of his, Everything Will Be OK, from 2006, is also old enough - but we'll need to wait a few more years for 2015's World of Tomorrow.

Thursday, December 6, 2018

Textbook Culture

I can't seem to shake the notion, from my last post, of those little infographic boxes that were (still are?) so popular in American History textbooks. To deal with this mild obsession I went ahead and made the sorts of boxes I have been imagining. Each has a musician, a book, a movie star, a film, and an athlete:

1920s

1930s

1940s

1950s

1960s

1970s

1980s

1990s

2000s

2010s

Wednesday, November 28, 2018

American Decades

So I was thinking about the last century, and what would be the textbook-required issues for each decade, in American History:

2010s

Trump
Social Media Culture and Violence
Paris Accords
Occupy and Arab Spring
Opioid Crisis and Healthcare

2000s

9/11
Great Recession
Smartphones
Obama
Afghanistan and Iraq

1990s

End of Cold War
Internet and Digitization
Globalism and Peace Movements
Partisan Politics
NAFTA and Automation

1980s

Home computers
Reagan
VHS and Cable
Decline of Unions
AIDS Epidemic

1970s

Watergate
Feminist Movement
Earth Day and Environmental Movement
Opening Asian Trade
Decline of the Cities

1960s

Vietnam and Hippies
Civil Rights
Moon Landing and Space Race
Kennedy/Assassinations
Great Society

1950s

Suburbia and Car Culture
Television and Advertising
Desegregation Begins
Red Scare
Korea

1940s

U.S. Entry into WWII and Internment
Atomic Technology
Post-War Global Order (U.N., Brenton Woods, GI Bill etc)
Computers
Plastics

1930s

Great Depression
FDR and New Deal
Dust Bowl
Resurgent Klan
Hollywood

1920s

Suffrage
Tenements and Immigration
Moving Pictures
Jazz on the Radio
Prohibition


They also tend to have, in most American History textbooks, a section on the water-cooler, second-tier items, so here are five more pieces for each decade as well, of stuff not covered in the main, above:

10s

LGBT Rights
#MeToo
Self-Driving Car
Streaming Services
Citizens United v. FEC

00s

Bush v. Gore
Human Genome Project
NSA
YouTube and Memes
MCU

90s

Gulf War
Americans with Disabilities Act
Coffee Shop Culture
Dream Team
The Simpsons

80s

Challenger Disaster
Hip hop
Spielberg  Movies
Video Games
WalMart's National Expansion

70s

Disco
Oil Crisis
Hijackings
Wounded Knee and AIM
Bruce Lee

60s

Bob Dylan
UFW and Cesar Chavez
To Kill a Mockingbird
British Invasion and Psychedelica
First Superbowl

50s

Military Industrial Complex
Modern Vaccinations
Jet Age Travel
Beat Generation
Rock n Roll

40s

J. Edgar Hoover at the FBI and the CIA
National Laboratories
Woody Guthrie and the Almanac Singers
Merrill Lynch: Insurance and Shareholders
Oklahoma!

30s

Blues
Superman
Skyscrapers
Jesse Owens and Joe Louis
Alcoholics Anonymous

20s

Capone and the St. Valentine's Day Massacre
Edwin Hubble and Robert Goddard
The Great Gatsby
Newspaper Comics
Scopes Trial